v7_flush_kern_cache_louis flushes up to L2?
Bastian Hecht
hechtb at gmail.com
Wed Apr 10 08:16:03 EDT 2013
Hi Jonny!
2013/4/10 Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin at arm.com>:
> Hi Bastian,
>
>
> On 10/04/13 11:43, Bastian Hecht wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've got a Cortex-A9 UP with a L2 and want to submit some PM code I've
>
>
> To clarify, is this an MPCore with a single core, or a genuine UP? This can
> be established from the 'U' bit of the MPIDR.
>
I didn't actually read out the U bit, but I'm sure I've got no SCU, so
I bet high that it's a genuine UP system.
>> written. Just to make sure I've made no mistake, it would be very
>> helpful if you can confirm a hypothesis I use in my code:
>>
>> v7_flush_kern_cache_louis: Flush the data cache up to Level of
>> Unification Inner Shareable
>>
>
> Depending on whether you're SMP or UP (bearing in mind that you can be SMP,
> but still only have one processor!) the IS is ignored in the
> v7_flush_dcache_louis operation:
> (from cache-v7.S)
>
> mrc p15, 1, r0, c0, c0, 1 @ read clidr, r0 = clidr
> ALT_SMP(ands r3, r0, #(7 << 21)) @ extract LoUIS from clidr
> ALT_UP(ands r3, r0, #(7 << 27)) @ extract LoUU from clidr
> ALT_SMP(mov r3, r3, lsr #20) @ r3 = LoUIS * 2
> ALT_UP(mov r3, r3, lsr #26) @ r3 = LoUU * 2
> ...
> flush levels based on value in r3
>
>
>> This flushes the data out up to the L2, right? The ARM docs say that
>> the Point of Unification would be my L2. I'm a bit confused by the
>> term "Level of Unification Inner Shareable" (that states that in an
>> SMP system L1 coherency is guaranteed and all is flushed to the L2?).
>>
>
> As you say, for the A9 (from the TRM) the CLIDR reports LoUIS is the same as
> LoUU and both specify L2.
Ok, this is the golden info I was looking for. So after cpu_suspend()
I am good with the following sequence?
flush L2 (outer_flush_all)
disable L2 (outer_disable)
Clear the SCTLR.C bit and issue an "isb"
flush L1 (v7_flush_dcache_all)
cpu_do_idle
and for resume:
invalidate L1
(trust cpu_resume to resume the L1 and enable the SCTLR.C bit)
resume L2 (outer_resume)
> Does that make things clearer, or are you still unsure about something?
If you could confirm the above sequence, I'm perfectly fine. Thanks
for the quick and exhaustive support.
Cheers,
Bastian
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list