GENERIC_GPIO considered deprecated

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi,

On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:07:54 -0700 Alexandre Courbot <gnurou at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:36:44 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Monday 08 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Should do the trick, if we can make sure that your tree is merged
> >> > >> prior to my patches.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm not sure but I think, arm-soc tree should be merged into mainline before others...
> >> > >
> >> > >> Can you put it into your tree for 3.10?
> >> > >>
> >> > > I did, so it should be fine.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > You may want to discuss how to handle this dependency with the arm-soc
> >> > maintainers (CC'd).
> >>
> >> I'm fine with putting the same branch into arm-soc as well as the gpio tree
> >> and anything else that might need it, that tends to be the least invasive
> >> way.
> >
> > Just a reminder: that had better be the exact same branch and that branch
> > had better never be rebased/rewritten ...
> 
> Sorry, which branch are we talking about - is it the one I published
> for -next initially? If so wouldn't it be simpler to withdraw it and
> have Grant integrate the patches in his branch? Since no one depends
> on them for now anyway...
> 
> I remember rebasing it once some time ago to add Acked-bys, but it
> hasn't changed since then.

I am talking about the branch that Arnd says should be merged into both
the arm-soc and gpio trees.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130409/dcce9b66/attachment.sig>