[RFCv1 09/11] pci: mvebu: add MSI support
Bjorn Helgaas
bhelgaas at google.com
Mon Apr 8 18:29:07 EDT 2013
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> This commit adds the MSI support for the Marvell EBU PCIe driver. The
> driver now looks at the 'msi-parent' property of the PCIe controller
> DT node, and if it exists, it gets the associated IRQ domain, which
> should be the MSI interrupt controller registered by the IRQ
> controller driver.
>
> Using this, the PCIe driver registers the ->setup_irq() and
> ->teardown_irq() callbacks using the newly introduced msi_chip
> infrastructure, which allows the kernel PCI core to use the MSI
> functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt | 5 +
> drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt
> index 192bdfb..53cc437 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt
> @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ Mandatory properties:
> corresponding registers
> - ranges: ranges for the PCI memory and I/O regions
>
> +Optional properties:
> +- msi-parent: a phandle pointing to the interrupt controller that
> + handles the MSI interrupts.
> +
> In addition, the Device Tree node must have sub-nodes describing each
> PCIe interface, having the following mandatory properties:
> - reg: used only for interrupt mapping, so only the first four bytes
> @@ -43,6 +47,7 @@ pcie-controller {
> #address-cells = <3>;
> #size-cells = <2>;
>
> + msi-parent = <&msi>;
> bus-range = <0x00 0xff>;
>
> reg = <0xd0040000 0x2000>, <0xd0042000 0x2000>,
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> index 9e6b137..b46fab8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> @@ -7,17 +7,23 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/msi.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mbus.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_pci.h>
> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>
> +#define INT_PCI_MSI_NR (16)
> +
> /*
> * PCIe unit register offsets.
> */
> @@ -101,10 +107,19 @@ struct mvebu_sw_pci_bridge {
>
> struct mvebu_pcie_port;
>
> +struct mvebu_pcie_msi {
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
> + struct irq_domain *domain;
> + struct mutex lock;
> + struct msi_chip chip;
> + phys_addr_t doorbell;
> +};
> +
> /* Structure representing all PCIe interfaces */
> struct mvebu_pcie {
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> struct mvebu_pcie_port *ports;
> + struct mvebu_pcie_msi msi;
> struct resource io;
> struct resource realio;
> struct resource mem;
> @@ -546,6 +561,11 @@ static inline struct mvebu_pcie *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> return sys->private_data;
> }
>
> +static inline struct mvebu_pcie_msi *to_mvebu_msi(struct msi_chip *chip)
> +{
> + return container_of(chip, struct mvebu_pcie_msi, chip);
> +}
> +
> /* Find the PCIe interface that corresponds to the given bus */
> static struct mvebu_pcie_port *mvebu_find_port_from_bus(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie,
> int bus)
> @@ -710,6 +730,8 @@ static struct pci_bus *mvebu_pcie_scan_bus(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> if (!bus)
> return NULL;
>
> + bus->msi = &pcie->msi.chip;
As I mentioned in the 08/11 patch, I'd like to keep arch-specific
stuff out of the PCI scanning path to preserve the ability to move
toward pci_scan_root_bus() eventually.
> pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>
> return bus;
> @@ -786,6 +808,105 @@ static void __iomem *mvebu_pcie_map_registers(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, ®s);
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)
> +static int mvebu_pcie_msi_alloc(struct mvebu_pcie_msi *chip)
> +{
> + int msi;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> +
> + msi = find_first_zero_bit(chip->used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
> +
> + if (msi < INT_PCI_MSI_NR)
> + set_bit(msi, chip->used);
> + else
> + msi = -ENOSPC;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
> +
> + return msi;
> +}
> +
> +static void mvebu_pcie_msi_free(struct mvebu_pcie_msi *chip, unsigned long irq)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = chip->chip.dev;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> +
> + if (!test_bit(irq, chip->used))
> + dev_err(dev, "trying to free unused MSI#%lu\n", irq);
> + else
> + clear_bit(irq, chip->used);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static int mvebu_pcie_setup_msi_irq(struct msi_chip *chip,
> + struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct msi_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct mvebu_pcie_msi *msi = to_mvebu_msi(chip);
If this took only the pci_dev (not the msi_chip), I think you could do this:
struct mvebu_pcie_msi *msi = &pdev->bus->sysdata->msi;
> + struct msi_msg msg;
> + unsigned int irq;
> + int hwirq;
> +
> + hwirq = mvebu_pcie_msi_alloc(msi);
> + if (hwirq < 0)
> + return hwirq;
> +
> + irq = irq_create_mapping(msi->domain, hwirq);
> + if (!irq)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + irq_set_msi_desc(irq, desc);
> +
> + msg.address_lo = msi->doorbell;
> + msg.address_hi = 0;
> + msg.data = 0xf00 | (hwirq + 16);
> +
> + write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void mvebu_pcie_teardown_msi_irq(struct msi_chip *chip,
> + unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + struct mvebu_pcie_msi *msi = to_mvebu_msi(chip);
> + struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> +
> + mvebu_pcie_msi_free(msi, d->hwirq);
> +}
> +
> +static int mvebu_pcie_enable_msi(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> + struct device_node *msi_node;
> + struct mvebu_pcie_msi *msi;
> +
> + msi = &pcie->msi;
> +
> + mutex_init(&msi->lock);
> +
> + msi_node = of_parse_phandle(pcie->pdev->dev.of_node,
> + "msi-parent", 0);
> + if (!msi_node)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + msi->domain = irq_find_host(msi_node);
> + if (!msi->domain)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(msi_node, "marvell,doorbell", &msi->doorbell))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + msi->chip.dev = &pcie->pdev->dev;
> + msi->chip.setup_irq = mvebu_pcie_setup_msi_irq;
> + msi->chip.teardown_irq = mvebu_pcie_teardown_msi_irq;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI */
> +
> static int __init mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct mvebu_pcie *pcie;
> @@ -903,6 +1024,13 @@ static int __init mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> mvebu_pcie_enable(pcie);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> + ret = mvebu_pcie_enable_msi(pcie);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "could not enable MSI support: %d\n",
> + ret);
> +#endif
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list