[PATCH] ARM: kirkwood: DT board setup for CloudBox
Jason Cooper
jason at lakedaemon.net
Mon Apr 8 13:00:49 EDT 2013
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 07:14:17AM +0200, Chris Moore wrote:
> Le 05/04/2013 03:11, Jason Cooper a écrit :
> >On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:34:35AM +0200, Simon Guinot wrote:
> >>
> ...
>
> >>Then we are back to the initial problem...
> >>
> >>Maybe we could append some suffixes based on the version:
> >>
> >>1: cloudbox-v1
> >>2: cloudbox-v2
> >>
> >>Or better, suffix based on the other code names:
> >>
> >>1: cloudbox-ns2mini
> >>2: cloudbox-familybox
> >>
> >>Or even let the things as they are:
> >>
> >>1: netspace_v2_mini
> >>2: cloudbox
> >In light of the above info, let's got with the third option. If we
> >discover a different LaCie Cloudbox board down the road, we can add an
> >appropriately more specific compatible string to differentiate. As you
> >can tell, I'd prefer to have something more specific in the original
> >commit, but we can only work with what we're given. :(
> >
>
> This is now OK with me.
> However I would like to have a more precise description somewhere;
> probably either in the Kconfig or, if this is obsolescent, in
> whatever replaces it.
> I think that someone grepping the kernel sources for the commercial
> name "CloudBox" should find both versions and be able to decide
> which one he has.
A one line comment in netspace_v2_mini dts file should suffice.
thx,
Jason.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list