[PATCH 07/18] cpufreq: s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq

Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Mon Apr 8 00:54:38 EDT 2013


On 5 April 2013 12:36, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com> wrote:
>> Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
>> for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this
>> should be sent to upstream via samsung tree.
>
> Hmm... Its already applied in Rafael's tree. But it doesn't mean that
> it can't be
> moved to your tree if there is a issue.
>
> What tree/branch? I used:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git for-next
>
>> Applying: cpufreq: s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq
>> error: patch failed: arch/arm/Kconfig:2166
>> error: arch/arm/Kconfig: patch does not apply
>
> above two are obvious as you haven't applied other patches in this series.
>
>> error: patch failed: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig:28
>> error: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig: patch does not apply
>> error: patch failed: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Makefile:17
>> error: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Makefile: patch does not apply
>> error: patch failed: drivers/cpufreq/Makefile:63
>> error: drivers/cpufreq/Makefile: patch does not apply
>
> Same here.
>
>> error: drivers/cpufreq/s3c2412-cpufreq.c: does not exist in index
>
> I can still see it in for-next.
>
> Attached is my patch based of your for-next

Kukjin,

As Rafael has already dropped it, can you apply it at your end and make sure
it doesn't miss the merge cycle?



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list