[PATCH v2 00/18] ARM: OMAP5: PM: Add MPUSS suspend and CPUidle support

Kevin Hilman khilman at linaro.org
Thu Apr 4 13:57:17 EDT 2013


Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> writes:

> On Thursday 04 April 2013 08:04 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Thursday 04 April 2013 04:22 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> Hi Santosh,
>>>
>>> Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Here is the refreshed version(v2) of the OMAP5 PM suspport which was posted
>>>> earlier (March 1st 2013). Patch-set incorporates comments from Nishant
>>>> Menon (Thanks for review NM) and his acked-by tags. I would like to get this
>>>> queued for 3.10 merge window if you are ok with the series.
>>>
>>> I did a review of this series with several comments on the individual
>>> patches.  
>>>
>> Thanks a lot Kevin. I have addressed all the comments and have
>> updated patches ready.
>> 
>>> I've already queued most of the CPUidle fixes/cleanups in my
>>> for_3.10/cleanup/cpuidle branch and will get that to Tony soon.  For the
>>> rest, I suggest probably breaking it up into cleanup/consolidation stuff
>>> and then OMAP5 support.  The latter will depend on all the OMAP5
>>> data/headers but the cleanup/consolidation stuff could be merged sooner
>>> (but probably a bit late for v3.10 now.)
>>>
>> I have already split the patch-set into 'consolidation' and 'OMAP5
>> support' since it was straight forward. Need to just build the
>> branches on top of your branches. So waiting for you to update
>> your 'for_3.10/*' branches.
>> 
>> For the merge, its your call:)
>> As you said OMAP5 support(couple of patches) has a dependency
>> on OMAP5 data files. I will at least make the branches ready on
>> top of yours.
>> 
> After looking at your tree, looks like the branches are already
> there. Idle branch name is not for_3.10/fixes/cpuidle though :)

oh, sorry.  I changed it to 'cleanup'.

> So I created 'for_3.10/omap_pm-cleanup' and 'for_3.10/omap5_pm_v2'
> and pushed on my git tree [1] in case you would like to have
> a look. I briefly tested them on OMAP4 device with
> CPUidle enabled and they seems to work fine. Will do OMAP5
> testing tomorrow and then post the updated patches on list.

Perfect, thanks.

Kevin




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list