[GIT PULL] OMAP4 coupled CPUidle support for v3.6

[Olof Johansson]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Colin Cross <ccross at android.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh
> <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net> wrote:
>>> Kevin,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman at ti.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Arnd, Olof,
>>>>
>>>> I know it is late, but I'm really hoping this can still make it for
>>>> v3.6, so consider this a [GIT PLEA].  ;)
>>>
>>> New features submitted halfway through the merge window? Yeah, that's late.
>>>
>>> I'll pull it in as late2/pm once the below is fixed, but I won't
>>> promise we'll send it up.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Kevin Hilman (1):
>>>>       ARM: OMAP4: CPUidle: add synchronization for coupled idle states
>>>>
>>>> Santosh Shilimkar (3):
>>>>       ARM: OMAP: timer: allow gp timer clock-event to be used on both cpus
>>>>       ARM: OMAP4: CPUidle: Use coupled cpuidle states to implement SMP cpuidle.
>>>>       ARM: OMAP4: CPUidle: Open broadcast clock-event device.
>>>
>>> This looks odd, Colin was author to the first of the commits
>>> attributed to Santosh.
>>>
>> Not sure what you mean. These patches are written by me. Kevin, Collin helped
>> in review. If you are referring to the {ARM: OMAP: timer: allow gp
>> timer clock-event to be
>> used on both cpus} which does have SOB from me and Colin. The very first version
>> of this version I picked was from product tree in which it was
>> commited on Coiln's name.
>> Later I updated that forf the multi-omap and the new timer code and
>> hence the update
>> in Author.
>
> I have no problem with the authorship on these two patches.

Santosh, Colin,

Ok, fair enough -- I just want to make sure attribution happens
appropriately, and it's a red flag when there's a S-o-b by someone not
at your company before yours without explanation.



-Olof