[RFC 2/4] ARM: OMAP: PM: Get rid of Powerdomain book-keeping from cpuidle

[Rajendra Nayak]

On Thursday 26 July 2012 04:13 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Tero Kristo<t-kristo at ti.com>  writes:
>
>> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 13:38 +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>> On Friday 20 July 2012 12:55 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Rajendra Nayak<rnayak at ti.com>   wrote:
>>>>> pwrdm_pre_transition()/pwrdm_post_transition() have always been high latency
>>>>> operations done within cpuidle to do Powerdomain level book-keeping to know
>>>>> what state transitions for different Powerdomains have been triggered.
>>>>> This is also useful to do a restore-on-demand in some cases when we know
>>>>> the context for the given Powerdomain was lost etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that we have definitive entry/exit points (thanks to the Powerdomain
>>>>> level usecounting) for Powerdomain transitions, these book-keeping functions
>>>>> can very well be moved from within CPUidle into pwrdm_clkdm_enable()/pwrdm_
>>>>> clkdm_disable() functions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also rename _pwrdm_pre/post_transition_cb() to pwrdm_pre/post_transition()
>>>>> and get rid of the original ones which iterate over all powerdomains.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak at ti.com>
>
> This is excellent!   Thanks for working on this.
>
> However, it needs a rebase against mainline though because I merged a
> set of optimizations[1] to this code already that only calls pre/post
> per-pwrdm.
>

Hi Kevin,

I thought some more on this patch, and I think this way of collecting
stats and knowing what state transitions the powerdomains been through
will not work on OMAP3, mainly because of the autodeps. Might work on
OMAP4 and beyond which do not need any autodeps.

Here why I think so,
Lets assume a Powerdomain X with a last module Y active, once Y disables
the last clock (lets assume no hardware controlled clocks for
simplicity), we clear the last power state register for X. However
due to autodeps X does not transition to a target state immediately.
It only does so when the MPU (and IVA) go down, and because
of the wakeup dependency (autodeps set a sleep and a wakeup dep with
both MPU and IVA) is also woken up every time MPU or IVA are up.
So its quite possible that X transitions in and out of sleep multiple
times before Y decides to re-enable its clocks, which is when we end up
looking for the last power state entered.
Lets say X entered OFF 3 times in between Y disabling and re-enabling
its clocks. Though we end up updating the counter only once (instead of
3) we still know and can tell Y that it lost context.
The problem however arises if for some reason X entered OFF
twice and happened to stay ON the third time the dependencies were met.
When Y re-enables its clocks, we end up telling it that it *did not*
lose context because we see the previous power state was ON.

I think as long as we have autodeps, the only way on OMAP3 to accurately
do this is to do it for all dependent domains in CPUIdle :(

regards,
Rajendra

PS: In theory maybe there is still a possibility to miss some domain 
transitions even with the current way of doing it in CPUidle. Its quite
possible that while MPU is asleep, IVA goes in and out of sleep multiple
times causing all dependent domains to also wakeup and sleep :-)