[PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Tue Jul 24 12:23:01 EDT 2012
On Tuesday 24 July 2012, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com wrote:
> I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by
> Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for
> cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings.
>
> I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already
> documented and it will concern all drivers.
I just looked at the patches for the first time, but it looks all great, so
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree,
> isn't it?
> By the way, I have updated documentation in patch 1/4 in the same way as you
> did with the patch 'mmc: dt: Deduplicate binding docs by referencing mmc.txt'.
> I didn't remove common properties from slot part because I think it is not
> obvious to use these properties into the slot node.
If you want to take it all through the mmc tree, that's also fine with me.
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list