[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: delay: allow timer-based delay implementation to be selected
shinya.kuribayashi.px at renesas.com
Tue Jul 24 05:06:06 EDT 2012
Hi Will, Jonathan,
On 7/20/2012 7:17 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:19:52PM +0100, Jonathan Austin wrote:
>> We should probably also ignore and additional registration calls, not just
>> those made after the delay loop has been calibrated...
>> Something like the patch below should do the trick.
> Cheers, pushed into my delay branch.
Thanks for the registration machanism. It looks nice, and works for
me on a Cortex-A9 SMP platform with a non-arch_timer counter.
I've picked up a revised version of the patch from will/delay and
merged it into our local development branch. We'll give it a try
in different conditions, UP and SMP, with/without DVFS and so on,
and let you know if I find anything.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel