linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
Lee Jones
lee.jones at linaro.org
Wed Jul 18 06:43:45 EDT 2012
On 18/07/12 11:33, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:29:26AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On 18/07/12 10:59, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> It's not the using device tree bit that creates concern for me here,
>>> it's the fact that the board and silicon aren't being separated.
>
>> What's the difference?
>
>>> +- db8500.dtsi // silicon
>>> \
>>> +-- snowball.dts // board
>
> I have glanced at some of this stuff in the past, thanks. Now think how
> that's working for people when they put the configuration for the
> silicon in the same DT node as the configuration for the board...
Granted, ideally the configuration and silicon description should be
separated. I don't know that is the case for us yet however. That is
something I'll enforce when we have a new dts file, which will be coming
very soon.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list