[PATCHv6 3/7] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod: flag hwmods/modules not supporting module level context status

Menon, Nishanth nm at ti.com
Tue Jul 17 04:11:44 EDT 2012


On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com> wrote:
> On OMAP4 most modules/hwmods support module level context status. On
> OMAP3 and earlier, we relied on the power domain level context status.
> Identify all modules that don't support 'context_offs' by marking the
> offset as USHRT_MAX. Rest have a valid 'context_offs' populated in
> .prcm structure already.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
> index 86fc513..828e7b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
> @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod omap44xx_l4_abe_hwmod = {
>         .prcm = {
>                 .omap4 = {
>                         .clkctrl_offs = OMAP4_CM1_ABE_L4ABE_CLKCTRL_OFFSET,
> +                       .context_offs = USHRT_MAX,

OMAP4430_RM_ABE_AESS_CONTEXT? why not use LOSTMEM_AESSMEM ? ABE will
need to know when it lost context to be able to reload it's firmware,
no?

Regards,
Nishanth Menon



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list