[PATCH 1/4] clk:spear1340:Fix: Rename clk ids within predefined limit

[vipul kumar samar]

On 7/13/2012 1:36 PM, viresh kumar wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Vipul Kumar Samar
> <vipulkumar.samar at st.com>  wrote:
>> The max limit of con_id is 16 and dev_id is 20. As of now for spear1340, many
>> clk ids are exceeding this predefined limit.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/spear/spear1340_clock.c b/drivers/clk/spear/spear1340_clock.c
>
>> @@ -509,23 +507,23 @@ void __init spear1340_clk_init(void)
>
>> -       clk_register_clkdev(clk1, "uart0_synth_gate_clk", NULL);
>
>> -       clk_register_clkdev(clk1, "sdhci_synth_gate_clk", NULL);
>
>> -       clk_register_clkdev(clk, "gmac_phy_input_mux_clk", NULL);
>> -       clk_register_clkdev(clk1, "gmac_phy_synth_gate_clk", NULL);
>
> These are the only places in this entire patch, where i found con_id
> crossing the limit.
> Then why so many changes? Aligning all to similar naming?

Not only for gmac some other ips also like sdhi_synth_gate_clk, 
uart1_synth_gate_clk, clcd_synth_mux_clk etc.

yes, to align all other gate, synth and mux clocks with similar naming.

>
>
>>          clk_register_clkdev(clk, NULL, "e0000000.serial");
>
> @Russell&  Mike: Above line uses maximum length of dev_id, i.e. 16.
> And because with DT we have so long device names now, out of which
> 8 - address
> 1 - '.'
> 1 - '\0'
>
> 10 are already gone and so only 6 are left for device name. Should we
> consider updating
> dev_id array size??

dev_id is 20 and con_id is 16

Regards
Vipul Samar