[PATCH v4 04/12] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank
Roger Quadros
rogerq at ti.com
Mon Jul 9 05:43:15 EDT 2012
Hi,
Just bumped across this patch and have a query.
On 03/16/2012 04:05 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> There is no more need to have saved_wakeup because bank->context.wake_en
> already holds that value. So getting rid of read/write operation associated
> with this field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti at ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 12 +++---------
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index 3a4f151..3b91ade 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ struct gpio_bank {
> u16 irq;
> int irq_base;
> struct irq_domain *domain;
> - u32 saved_wakeup;
> u32 non_wakeup_gpios;
> u32 enabled_non_wakeup_gpios;
> struct gpio_regs context;
> @@ -777,7 +776,6 @@ static int omap_mpuio_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> - bank->saved_wakeup = __raw_readl(mask_reg);
> __raw_writel(0xffff & ~bank->context.wake_en, mask_reg);
OK, here you are overwriting the mask_reg with the wakeup bitmask
without saving the mask_reg's original content.
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>
> @@ -793,7 +791,7 @@ static int omap_mpuio_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> - __raw_writel(bank->saved_wakeup, mask_reg);
> + __raw_writel(bank->context.wake_en, mask_reg);
Now you are restoring nothing but the same content that you stored
during suspend. This will cause the non-wakeup gpio interrupts to get
masked between a suspend/resume. So isn't this a bug?
Proper solution would be to save the mask_reg context into another
register than context.wake_en during suspend.
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>
> return 0;
cheers,
-roger
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list