[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: delay: allow timer-based delay implementation to be selected
will.deacon at arm.com
Thu Jul 5 08:56:22 EDT 2012
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 01:12:14PM +0100, Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
> Ok, I gave your patch a try (including above), and confirmed that:
> * It works fine with non-arch_timer counter. I'm using SH/R-Mobile
> devices, with a memory mapped I/O, 32-bit free-run up-counter
> running at 13MHz.
> * Secondary CPU calibration gets skipped as expected.
> * Your new timer-based delay works as before (loop-based one). I've
> verified 10..1999-microsecond busy-wait with a reasonable accuracy
> (and confirmed that 2000+ usec gets rejected as intended).
Great, thanks! Can I add your tested-by please?
> By the way,
> > + return lpj_fine ?: 0;
> Is there any difference with just
> return lpj_fine;
Of course, I'll make that change, cheers.
Stephen -- can I keep your reviewed-by with the additional function please?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel