[GIT PULL] at91: first batch of cleanup for 3.6
Nicolas Ferre
nicolas.ferre at atmel.com
Wed Jul 4 05:55:01 EDT 2012
On 07/04/2012 09:42 AM, Arnd Bergmann :
> On Monday 02 July 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 02 July 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> 6887a4131da3adaab011613776d865f4bcfb5678:
>>>
>>> Linux 3.5-rc5 (2012-06-30 16:08:57 -0700)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-for-next-cleanup
>>
>> Pulled into next/cleanup
>
> Unfortunately, I got a bunch of new builf errors and warnings:
>
> 8<----
> ARM: at91: fix new build errors
>
> MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER and SPARSE_IRQ are now required everywhere because
> mach/irqs.h and mach/entry-macros.S are gone but the symbols are
> only selected for AT91SAM9, not for the NOMMU parts.
>
> A few files now need to include linux/io.h directly, which used to
> be included through other headers that have changed.
>
> The new at91_aic_irq_priorities variable is only used with CONFIG_OF
> enabled and should not be visible otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> ---
>
> Please check these patches for correctness, and try to be more careful
> to avoid such problems in the future. I found these just building the
> defconfig files, not even invoking my randconfig scripts.
Sorry for this Arnd, I should have triggered my building scripts earlier
for this request...
Tell me if you can queue your fixing patch or if you prefer that I
rework it and send it back a series to you...
Anyway, here is my:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
Thanks a lot.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> index 7d0c40a..c8050b1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ config SOC_AT91SAM9
> config SOC_AT91RM9200
> bool "AT91RM9200"
> select CPU_ARM920T
> + select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
> + select SPARSE_IRQ
> select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> select HAVE_AT91_DBGU0
>
> @@ -142,6 +144,8 @@ config ARCH_AT91SAM9G45
> config ARCH_AT91X40
> bool "AT91x40"
> depends on !MMU
> + select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
> + select SPARSE_IRQ
> select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
>
> endchoice
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c
> index 4c0f5fd..46090e6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
> #include <asm/system_misc.h>
> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c
> index c5eaaa0..1e02c0e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ static struct irq_domain *at91_aic_domain;
> static struct device_node *at91_aic_np;
> static unsigned int n_irqs = NR_AIC_IRQS;
> static unsigned long at91_aic_caps = 0;
> -static unsigned int *at91_aic_irq_priorities;
>
> /* AIC5 introduces a Source Select Register */
> #define AT91_AIC_CAP_AIC5 (1 << 0)
> @@ -359,6 +358,8 @@ static void __init __maybe_unused at91_aic5_hw_init(unsigned int spu_vector)
> }
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> +static unsigned int *at91_aic_irq_priorities;
> +
> static int at91_aic_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
> irq_hw_number_t hw)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c
> index dc474bc..fca9790 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/ioctl.h>
> #include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list