[PATCH V2 5/6] x86: add CONFIG_ARM_AMBA, selected by STA2X11

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 03 July 2012, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> Peter Anvin:
> > There is no problem with adding ARM or !X86 dependencies to drivers
> > now and fixing them later or as required.
> 
> Ok. This is my summary of the compilation errors I have when
> enabling ARM_AMBA undex x86 and enabling everything that appears
> in "make oldconfig":
> 
> 
> This is a sum up of the errors in all driver that are
> enabled by telling "CONFIG_ARM_AMBA=y" in the x86 config.
> 
>    drivers/dma/pl330.c: register names conflict with arch symbols
>      proposed fix: use proper prefix names
> 
>    drivers/dma/amba-pl08x.c: needs <asm/hardware/pl080.h>
>      proposed fix: move pl080.h to include/linux

Note that there is already an include/linux/amba/pl08x.h.
I would just move the few parts of pl080.h that are actually
needed with global visibility there, and move the rest
to drivers/dma/.

>    drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c: uses chained_irq_enter/exit
>      proposed fix: depend on CONFIG_ARM (the function only exists in arm)
> 
>    drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c: uses <asm/sizes.h>
>    drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c: uses readsl/writesl
>      proposed fix: use linux/sizes.h and provide readsl/writesl like others do

Ack on the linux/sizes.h, that definitely makes sense.

I'm not sure I want to spread readsl/writesl beyond the architectures
that already have it. Maybe instead change the driver to use ioread32_rep,
which is already available on all architectures and is defined the
same way as readsl on ARM.

>    drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c: uses writel_relaxed
>      proposed fix: depend on CONFIG_ARM (this is a spear-only cell by now)

This one on the other hand makes sense to be defined on all architectures
IMHO. I don't mind restricting the driver to ARM for now, but having
a generic writel_relaxed would be nice.

	Arnd