[PATCH 1/6] mfd: mc13xxx-core: ADC conv: ack existing pending irqs before requesting
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Mon Jan 30 02:15:02 EST 2012
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:33:23AM +1100, Marc Reilly wrote:
> This acks any existing pending ADCDONE irqs before requesting one for the
> new conversion, rather than after.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Reilly <marc at cpdesign.com.au>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
> index 1fd265d..8cb83ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
> @@ -561,9 +561,9 @@ int mc13xxx_adc_do_conversion(struct mc13xxx *mc13xxx, unsigned int mode,
> }
>
> dev_dbg(mc13xxx->dev, "%s: request irq\n", __func__);
> + mc13xxx_irq_ack(mc13xxx, MC13XXX_IRQ_ADCDONE);
> mc13xxx_irq_request(mc13xxx, MC13XXX_IRQ_ADCDONE,
> mc13xxx_handler_adcdone, __func__, &adcdone_data);
> - mc13xxx_irq_ack(mc13xxx, MC13XXX_IRQ_ADCDONE);
>
> mc13xxx_reg_write(mc13xxx, MC13XXX_ADC0, adc0);
> mc13xxx_reg_write(mc13xxx, MC13XXX_ADC1, adc1);
hmm, I wonder if the irq should be acked if it's not requested. The code
doesn't do error checking, but consider mc13xxx_irq_request fails
because the irq is already requested by someone else. Then acking before
requesting is wrong, isn't it? Maybe irq_request should ack the irq or
maybe better introduce a function mc13xxx_irq_request_and_ack that acks
only if the request part is OK?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list