Pinmux bindings proposal V2
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at linaro.org
Sun Jan 29 21:10:43 EST 2012
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:16:53AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
...
> I guess the analog we should follow here is clk_get and clk_set_rate,
> except we would have pinconf_set_state with predefined states.
>
It seems working for cases that we only change pinconf but never pinmux
for different configuration states. But how would that work for cases
that require mux change for different configuration states?
--
Regards,
Shawn
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list