[PATCH] ARM: mx28evk: Simplify GPIO requests
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at linaro.org
Thu Jan 26 07:19:40 EST 2012
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:41:49PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Requesting all the GPIOs on a single array (mx28evk_gpios[]) can make the
> error handling of gpio_requests much simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam at freescale.com>
Looks good. A couple trivial comments below though.
> ---
> This approach was suggested by Sascha Hauer:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/124661/
>
> arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mx28evk.c | 72 ++++++++-----------------------------
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mx28evk.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mx28evk.c
> index fdb0a56..6260ec3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mx28evk.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mx28evk.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,6 @@ static const struct gpio_led_platform_data mx28evk_led_data __initconst = {
> /* fec */
> static void __init mx28evk_fec_reset(void)
> {
> - int ret;
> struct clk *clk;
>
> /* Enable fec phy clock */
> @@ -231,32 +230,6 @@ static void __init mx28evk_fec_reset(void)
> if (!IS_ERR(clk))
> clk_prepare_enable(clk);
>
> - /* Power up fec phy */
> - ret = gpio_request(MX28EVK_FEC_PHY_POWER, "fec-phy-power");
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_err("Failed to request gpio fec-phy-%s: %d\n", "power", ret);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - ret = gpio_direction_output(MX28EVK_FEC_PHY_POWER, 0);
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_err("Failed to drive gpio fec-phy-%s: %d\n", "power", ret);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - /* Reset fec phy */
> - ret = gpio_request(MX28EVK_FEC_PHY_RESET, "fec-phy-reset");
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_err("Failed to request gpio fec-phy-%s: %d\n", "reset", ret);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - gpio_direction_output(MX28EVK_FEC_PHY_RESET, 0);
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_err("Failed to drive gpio fec-phy-%s: %d\n", "reset", ret);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> mdelay(1);
This delay is supposed to be in the middle of the two calls here. As
we are moving around the first call, can you give it a test to see if
the mdelay is still mandatory? I would remove it if it's not necessary.
> gpio_set_value(MX28EVK_FEC_PHY_RESET, 1);
> }
> @@ -417,9 +390,14 @@ static void __init mx28evk_add_regulators(void)
> static void __init mx28evk_add_regulators(void) {}
> #endif
>
> -static struct gpio mx28evk_lcd_gpios[] = {
> +static const __initconst struct gpio mx28evk_gpios[] = {
Put __initconst after mx28evk_gpios[], please.
> { MX28EVK_LCD_ENABLE, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "lcd-enable" },
> { MX28EVK_BL_ENABLE, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "bl-enable" },
> + { MX28EVK_FLEXCAN_SWITCH, GPIOF_DIR_OUT, "flexcan-switch" },
> + { MX28EVK_MMC0_SLOT_POWER, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "mmc0-slot-power" },
> + { MX28EVK_MMC1_SLOT_POWER, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "mmc1-slot-power" },
> + { MX28EVK_FEC_PHY_POWER, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "fec-phy-power" },
> + { MX28EVK_FEC_PHY_RESET, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "fec-phy-reset" },
> };
>
> static const struct mxs_saif_platform_data
> @@ -447,25 +425,19 @@ static void __init mx28evk_init(void)
> if (mx28evk_fec_get_mac())
> pr_warn("%s: failed on fec mac setup\n", __func__);
>
> + ret = gpio_request_array(mx28evk_gpios, ARRAY_SIZE(mx28evk_gpios));
> +
Unnecessary blank line.
Regards,
Shawn
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("One or more GPIOs failed to be requested: %d\n", ret);
> +
> mx28evk_fec_reset();
> mx28_add_fec(0, &mx28_fec_pdata[0]);
> mx28_add_fec(1, &mx28_fec_pdata[1]);
>
> - ret = gpio_request_one(MX28EVK_FLEXCAN_SWITCH, GPIOF_DIR_OUT,
> - "flexcan-switch");
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_err("failed to request gpio flexcan-switch: %d\n", ret);
> - } else {
> - mx28_add_flexcan(0, &mx28evk_flexcan_pdata[0]);
> - mx28_add_flexcan(1, &mx28evk_flexcan_pdata[1]);
> - }
> + mx28_add_flexcan(0, &mx28evk_flexcan_pdata[0]);
> + mx28_add_flexcan(1, &mx28evk_flexcan_pdata[1]);
>
> - ret = gpio_request_array(mx28evk_lcd_gpios,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(mx28evk_lcd_gpios));
> - if (ret)
> - pr_warn("failed to request gpio pins for lcd: %d\n", ret);
> - else
> - mx28_add_mxsfb(&mx28evk_mxsfb_pdata);
> + mx28_add_mxsfb(&mx28evk_mxsfb_pdata);
>
> mxs_saif_clkmux_select(MXS_DIGCTL_SAIF_CLKMUX_EXTMSTR0);
> mx28_add_saif(0, &mx28evk_mxs_saif_pdata[0]);
> @@ -480,20 +452,8 @@ static void __init mx28evk_init(void)
> mxs_add_platform_device("mxs-sgtl5000", 0, NULL, 0,
> NULL, 0);
>
> - /* power on mmc slot by writing 0 to the gpio */
> - ret = gpio_request_one(MX28EVK_MMC0_SLOT_POWER, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW,
> - "mmc0-slot-power");
> - if (ret)
> - pr_warn("failed to request gpio mmc0-slot-power: %d\n", ret);
> - else
> - mx28_add_mxs_mmc(0, &mx28evk_mmc_pdata[0]);
> -
> - ret = gpio_request_one(MX28EVK_MMC1_SLOT_POWER, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW,
> - "mmc1-slot-power");
> - if (ret)
> - pr_warn("failed to request gpio mmc1-slot-power: %d\n", ret);
> - else
> - mx28_add_mxs_mmc(1, &mx28evk_mmc_pdata[1]);
> + mx28_add_mxs_mmc(0, &mx28evk_mmc_pdata[0]);
> + mx28_add_mxs_mmc(1, &mx28evk_mmc_pdata[1]);
>
> mx28_add_rtc_stmp3xxx();
>
> --
> 1.7.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list