[PATCH 8/8 RESEND] ARM: dma-mapping: add support for IOMMU mapper
Marek Szyprowski
m.szyprowski at samsung.com
Thu Jan 26 03:09:26 EST 2012
Hello,
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 1:59 PM Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 04:49:21PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > This patch add a complete implementation of DMA-mapping API for
> > devices that have IOMMU support. All DMA-mapping calls are supported.
> >
> > This patch contains some of the code kindly provided by Krishna Reddy
> > <vdumpa at nvidia.com> and Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p at samsung.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski at samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is the corrected version of the previous patch from the "[PATCH 0/8
> > v4] ARM: DMA-mapping framework redesign" thread which can be found here:
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg27382.html
> >
> > Previous version had very nasty bug which causes memory trashing if
> > DMA-mapping managed to allocate pages larger than 4KiB. The problem was
> > in __iommu_alloc_buffer() function which did not check how many pages
> > has been left to allocate.
>
> This patch seems to be incomplete.
>
> If the standard DMA API is used (the one which exists in current kernels)
> and NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH is enabled, then where do we set the DMA length
> in the scatterlist?
Standard DMA API is also updated to work correctly with NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH,
please notice the following chunk:
-----
@@ -644,6 +659,9 @@ int arm_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist
*sg, int nents,
int i, j;
for_each_sg(sg, s, nents, i) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH
+ s->dma_length = s->length;
+#endif
s->dma_address = ops->map_page(dev, sg_page(s), s->offset,
s->length, dir, attrs);
if (dma_mapping_error(dev, s->dma_address))
-----
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg154889.html for the reference)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-iommu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-iommu.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..6668b41
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-iommu.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> > +#ifndef ASMARM_DMA_IOMMU_H
> > +#define ASMARM_DMA_IOMMU_H
> > +
> > +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> > +
> > +#include <linux/mm_types.h>
> > +#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> > +#include <linux/dma-debug.h>
> > +#include <linux/kmemcheck.h>
> > +
> > +#include <asm/memory.h>
>
> I can't see anything in here which needs asm/memory.h - if files which
> include this need it, please include it in there so we can see why it's
> needed.
Ok, I will fix this issue.
>
> > +
> > +struct dma_iommu_mapping {
> > + /* iommu specific data */
> > + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> > +
> > + void *bitmap;
> > + size_t bits;
> > + unsigned int order;
> > + dma_addr_t base;
> > +
> > + spinlock_t lock;
> > + struct kref kref;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct dma_iommu_mapping *
> > +arm_iommu_create_mapping(struct bus_type *bus, dma_addr_t base, size_t size,
> > + int order);
> > +
> > +void arm_iommu_release_mapping(struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping);
> > +
> > +int arm_iommu_attach_device(struct device *dev,
> > + struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping);
> > +
> > +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> > +#endif
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > index 4845c09..2287b01 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
> > #include <asm/sizes.h>
> > #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> >
> > +#include <linux/iommu.h>
>
> linux/ includes should be grouped together.
Ok, I will fix this.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/vmregion.h b/arch/arm/mm/vmregion.h
> > index 15e9f04..6bbc402 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mm/vmregion.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/vmregion.h
> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ struct arm_vmregion {
> > struct list_head vm_list;
> > unsigned long vm_start;
> > unsigned long vm_end;
> > - struct page *vm_pages;
> > + void *priv;
>
> I want to think about that - I may wish to export the vm_pages via
> the new dma-mappings file to provide additional information.
For IOMMU case I need to store a page array for each allocated buffer.
I haven't analyzed it yet, but maybe it would be possible to use standard
vmalloc style entries and avoid creating separate arm_vmregion for coherent
allocations?
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list