[PATCH 3/3] S3C2443: add power domain for usb phy

[Felipe Balbi]

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:01:33PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > 
> > Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 11:15:11 schrieb Felipe Balbi:
> > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:13:00AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > > sorry for mail spam :-)
> > > >
> > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 10:51:31 schrieb Felipe Balbi:
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:14AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Felipe,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 10:38:32 schrieb Felipe Balbi:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 09:59:02PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > > > > > > The phy-power-handling is common to S3C2443/2416/2450, so
> > > > > > > > introduce a s3c2443-pm-common.c to handle this for all of them.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This makes it possible to remove the raw write to the
> > > > > > > > PWRCFG-register from the s3c-hsudc driver.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I believe this doesn't really depend on previous patches (??) In
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > case, it can be carried with s3c's tree:
> > > > > > it does depend on the previous patch [2/3], as the device power
> > > > > > domain is controlled through the runtime-pm subsystem whose calls
> > > > > > were added in it.
> > > > >
> > > > > then I will need proper acks to carry this patch.
> > > >
> > > > another possibility would be to have patch 2 and 3 get in through the
> > > > samsung tree, as the majority of the change lies on this side (i.e.
> > > > introducing a new file in plat-s3c24xx)
> > >
> > > yet another one, would be to defer patch 3/3 by one merge window ;-)
> > 
> > also fine by me ;-)
> > 
> > But let's see first what Kgene says.
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Sorry for join lately on this.
> 
> I think we need to implement more pm domain for s3c24xx as well
> usbphy. So if Felipe is ok, I'd like to handle Heiko's 2nd and 3rd
> patches in my tree. Of course, I need Felipe's ack before that.
> BTW, frankly, I'm not sure we can finish supporting pm domain for all
> of s3c24xx for v3.4 :)

In that case, how about we take things slow ? I can carry pm-runtime
patch (2/3) and by 3.5 or 3.6 you will only need to touch
arch/arm/-related code.

If you guarantee that it won't make it in 3.4, I'm ok carrying
pm-runtime patch as it won't break anything anyway (I suppose).

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120124/d9c08cdb/attachment.sig>