[PATCH RFC 2/2] mtd : Make the mtd_suspend return 0 if the suspend is not implemented

Brian Norris computersforpeace at gmail.com
Tue Jan 24 03:09:04 EST 2012


Hi,

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti at ti.com> wrote:
...
>  include/linux/mtd/mtd.h |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> index 1a81fde..c717bb6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> @@ -427,9 +427,9 @@ static inline int mtd_is_locked(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
>
>  static inline int mtd_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  {
> -       if (!mtd->suspend)
> -               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -       return mtd->suspend(mtd);
> +       if (mtd->suspend)
> +               return mtd->suspend(mtd);
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
>  static inline void mtd_resume(struct mtd_info *mtd)

I believe this fix is already accounted for in Artem Bityutskiy's
l2-mtd-2.6 repository as:

commit 091a7fe219ee8d3e76be9e02221433af10c6f574
mtd: fix MTD suspend
(http://git.infradead.org/users/dedekind/l2-mtd-2.6.git/commit/091a7fe219ee8d3e76be9e02221433af10c6f574)

However, the bug made it into the 3.3 merge window, so shouldn't this
bugfix be sent upstream immediately?

Brian



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list