[PATCH RFC 2/2] mtd : Make the mtd_suspend return 0 if the suspend is not implemented
Brian Norris
computersforpeace at gmail.com
Tue Jan 24 03:09:04 EST 2012
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti at ti.com> wrote:
...
> include/linux/mtd/mtd.h | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> index 1a81fde..c717bb6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> @@ -427,9 +427,9 @@ static inline int mtd_is_locked(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
>
> static inline int mtd_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> {
> - if (!mtd->suspend)
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - return mtd->suspend(mtd);
> + if (mtd->suspend)
> + return mtd->suspend(mtd);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static inline void mtd_resume(struct mtd_info *mtd)
I believe this fix is already accounted for in Artem Bityutskiy's
l2-mtd-2.6 repository as:
commit 091a7fe219ee8d3e76be9e02221433af10c6f574
mtd: fix MTD suspend
(http://git.infradead.org/users/dedekind/l2-mtd-2.6.git/commit/091a7fe219ee8d3e76be9e02221433af10c6f574)
However, the bug made it into the 3.3 merge window, so shouldn't this
bugfix be sent upstream immediately?
Brian
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list