[PATCH v2 11/13] ARM: only include mach/irqs.h for !SPARSE_IRQ
Nicolas Pitre
nico at fluxnic.net
Fri Jan 20 17:48:31 EST 2012
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 03:11 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> >> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring at calxeda.com>
> >>
> >> Make mach/irqs.h optional for SPARSE_IRQ. With this change irqs.h can be
> >> removed by converting platforms over to sparse irq.
> >>
> >> This intentionally breaks platforms that enable SPARSE_IRQ.
> >
> > I don't get what you mean here. The above seems contradictory.
> >
>
> You're right. The intro explains things more clearly.
The intro won't be part of the git history, so please make sure
individual commit logs are sensible on their own.
> This breaks platforms (at boot time) that don't select SPARSE_IRQ, but
> let users enable it in their config. I don't understand why sparse irq
> is a user visible config option. We could move HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ down to
> each platform that selects SPARSE_IRQ and prevent enabling, but I
> think allowing it to break is good encouragement for others to fix
> those platforms. I'm open to other ideas.
SPARSE_IRQ shouldn't be a user configurable option. There is just no
point for a user configuring a kernel to be able to change this.
Nicolas
>
> Rob
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list