[PATCH 4/4] at91 : implement the standby function for pm/cpuidle

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 09:25:34AM +1100, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> After this patch we still have the limitation that only one at91
> platform can be built into the kernel (this is an existing problem,
> which there is an on going effort to resolve) because the at91_standby
> function is defined via ifdefs. So the at91_standby define should still
> be converted to a function pointer and assigned via the soc right? Of
> course, this can be done in a subsequent patch.

Correct; that's something I did suggest.