[PATCH v2] ARM: mx28: Clear CLKGATE bit prior to changing DIV field
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at linaro.org
Wed Jan 18 02:14:30 EST 2012
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 03:58:51PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> MX28 Reference Manual states the following about the CLKGATE bit of register HW_CLKCTRL_SAIF0:
>
This is stated for not only SAIF but also other clocks with a divider.
> "The DIV field can change ONLY when this clock gate bit field is low."
>
I'm afraid that the change of DIV field does not necessarily mean there
is a desired frequency output on the clock. I remember I have done a
testing to see that I can update the DIV field of one clock with
clearing its gate bit but keeping its parent clock gated. But obviously
you won't get a frequency output on the clock in this case.
So translating the above statement to what I have seen, I would say
the rate of one clock can only be changed when the clock is enabled.
To clk api client drivers, that means clk_enable() has been called
on the clock to have the clock itself and its parent clock enabled.
> So clear this bit prior to writing to the DIV field as required.
>
I would say clk_enable() prior to clk_set_rate() is required.
> This also fixes the following error during mxs-sgtl5000 probe.
>
> [ 0.660000] saif0_clk_set_rate: divider writing timeout
> [ 0.670000] mxs-sgtl5000: probe of mxs-sgtl5000.0 failed with error -110
> [ 0.670000] ALSA device list:
> [ 0.680000] No soundcards found.
>
> Audio is functional after this change.
>
This is an known issue. Some people prefer to fix it in the mxs clock
code while I incline to say the client driver should be fixed for this.
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam at freescale.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Clear CLKGATE and DIV fields at the same time
>
> arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c
> index 5d68e41..0bcfd97 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c
> @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static int name##_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) \
> return -EINVAL; \
> \
> reg = __raw_readl(CLKCTRL_BASE_ADDR + HW_CLKCTRL_##rs); \
> - reg &= ~BM_CLKCTRL_##rs##_DIV; \
> + reg &= ~(BM_CLKCTRL_##rs##_CLKGATE | BM_CLKCTRL_##rs##_DIV); \
> reg |= div << BP_CLKCTRL_##rs##_DIV; \
> __raw_writel(reg, CLKCTRL_BASE_ADDR + HW_CLKCTRL_##rs); \
> \
So you end up with leaving the gate bit of the clock changed by
clk_set_rate() call. I'm not sure that is desirable.
Regards,
Shawn
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list