[PATCH] ARM: gic: refactor irq_start assignment

[Rob Herring]

On 01/17/2012 06:09 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> The irq_start and hwirq_base assignment code is fairly hairy and ended
> up being difficult to read following a conflict resolution for 3.2.
> 
> This patch rearranges the code slightly to make it easier to read.
> 
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/common/gic.c |   13 ++++++-------
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> index c47d619..ca6b5dd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> @@ -694,13 +694,12 @@ void __init gic_init_bases(unsigned int gic_nr, int irq_start,
>  	 * For primary GICs, skip over SGIs.
>  	 * For secondary GICs, skip over PPIs, too.
>  	 */
> -	domain->hwirq_base = 32;
> -	if (gic_nr == 0) {
> -		if ((irq_start & 31) > 0) {
> -			domain->hwirq_base = 16;
> -			if (irq_start != -1)
> -				irq_start = (irq_start & ~31) + 16;
> -		}
> +	if (gic_nr == 0 && (irq_start & 31) > 0) {
> +		domain->hwirq_base = 16;
> +		if (irq_start != -1)
> +			irq_start = (irq_start & ~31) + 16;
> +	} else {
> +		domain->hwirq_base = 32;
>  	}

This should probably just be rolled into Grant's irqdomain work. In any
case, it's going to conflict with it.

Rob