[GIT PULL] Samsung devel for v3.3
Kukjin Kim
kgene.kim at samsung.com
Tue Jan 17 02:23:01 EST 2012
Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
Hi Olof,
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Mark Brown
> <broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 05:21:02PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >
> >> Mark, Kukjin, can either of you split out the fixes in a separate
> branch?
> >
> > Here's some of them, there were a few others I'm aware of that depended
> > on feature updates. Ideally we'd actually get all the changes that have
> > been in -next in.
> >
> > The following changes since commit
> 5f0a6e2d503896062f641639dacfe5055c2f593b:
> >
> > Linux 3.2-rc7 (2011-12-23 21:51:06 -0800)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/misc.git
> fixes/samsung
> >
> > Mark Brown (5):
> > ARM: SAMSUNG: Fix GPIO space reservation for S3C64xx platforms
> > ARM: S3C64XX: Correct reservation of GPIOs for CPU module on
> Cragganmore
>
> The above two don't seem to have been in the branch that was sent by
> Kukjin, it had:
>
> ARM: EXYNOS: Invert VCLK polarity for framebuffer on ORIGEN
> ARM: S3C64XX: Fix interrupt configuration for PCA935x on Cragganmore
> ARM: S3C64XX: Fix the memory mapped GPIOs on Cragganmore
> ARM: S3C64XX: Remove hsmmc1 from Cragganmore
> ARM: S3C64XX: Remove unconditional power domain disables
> ARM: SAMSUNG: Declare struct platform_device in plat/s3c64xx-spi.h
> ARM: SAMSUNG: dma-ops.h needs mach/dma.h
> ARM: SAMSUNG: Guard against multiple inclusion of plat/dma.h
>
> I've pulled the branch from him.
>
No, please drop it because above you said are in mainline now.
- commit 4ff13995("ARM: SAMSUNG: Fix GPIO space reservation for S3C64xx
platforms")
- commit aaed44e1("ARM: S3C64XX: Correct reservation of GPIOs for CPU module
on Cragganmore")
Seems to be merged via arm-soc/next/boards and there was some
mis-communications.
(Refer to the commit 8df97495 ("Merge branch 'samsung/board' into
next/boards"))
Sorry for bothering.
> Kukjin, please consider picking up the missing two patches above and
> send another pull request with those and any other needed fixes.
>
As I said, please ignore next-samsung-devel-samsung and Mark's
fixes/samsung.
I think, you can go ahead with my previous pull request, samsung-fixes.
If any problems, please let me know.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list