[PATCH 04/11] mm: page_alloc: introduce alloc_contig_range()

Michal Nazarewicz mina86 at mina86.com
Mon Jan 16 07:48:11 EST 2012


On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:01:10 +0100, Mel Gorman <mel at csn.ul.ie> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 09:04:31PM +0100, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> >On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 01:39:05PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> >>From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86 at mina86.com>
>> >>+	/* Make sure all pages are isolated. */
>> >>+	if (!ret) {
>> >>+		lru_add_drain_all();
>> >>+		drain_all_pages();
>> >>+		if (WARN_ON(test_pages_isolated(start, end)))
>> >>+			ret = -EBUSY;
>> >>+	}
>>
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:16:13 +0100, Mel Gorman <mel at csn.ul.ie> wrote:
>> >Another global IPI seems overkill. Drain pages only from the local CPU
>> >(drain_pages(get_cpu()); put_cpu()) and test if the pages are isolated.
>>
>> Is get_cpu() + put_cpu() required? Won't drain_local_pages() work?
>>
>
> drain_local_pages() calls smp_processor_id() without preemption
> disabled.

Thanks, I wasn't sure if preemption is an issue.

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn at google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list