[PATCH 08/11] ep93xx: Move EP93XX_WATCHDOG_BASE define to driver
Ryan Mallon
rmallon at gmail.com
Fri Jan 13 16:46:39 EST 2012
On 14/01/12 04:45, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 8:15 PM, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>> The EP93xx watchdog driver is the only user of this define, move it there.
>>
>> Cc: Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten at visionengravers.com>
>> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg at iki.fi>
>> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim at iguana.be>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Mallon <rmallon at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h | 2 --
>> drivers/watchdog/ep93xx_wdt.c | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h
>> index 387f745..225790d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h
>> @@ -127,7 +127,5 @@
>> #define EP93XX_SYSCON_SYSCFG_LCSN1 (1<<0)
>> #define EP93XX_SYSCON_SWLOCK EP93XX_SYSCON_REG(0xc0)
>>
>> -#define EP93XX_WATCHDOG_BASE EP93XX_APB_IOMEM(0x00140000)
>> -
>>
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/ep93xx_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/ep93xx_wdt.c index 726b7df..82f648a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/ep93xx_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/ep93xx_wdt.c
>> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static unsigned long boot_status;
>> #define WDT_IN_USE 0
>> #define WDT_OK_TO_CLOSE 1
>>
>> +#define EP93XX_WATCHDOG_BASE EP93XX_APB_IOMEM(0x00140000)
>> #define EP93XX_WDT_REG(x) (EP93XX_WATCHDOG_BASE + (x))
>> #define EP93XX_WDT_WATCHDOG EP93XX_WDT_REG(0x00)
>> #define EP93XX_WDT_WDSTATUS EP93XX_WDT_REG(0x04)
> Ryan,
>
> I have a patch to convert the watchdog driver to a platform device and
> use the WatchDog Timer Driver Core. This patch will end up moving the
> base define to soc.h instead. But, for now, this looks good.
Is your patch ready to go? I'm in no rush to get these patches in, and I
can add it to this series if you like, which would get rid of the need
for this patch and would also mean that we don't need the include of
<mach/ep93xx-regs.h> in the watchdog driver in the final patch.
Thanks,
~Ryan
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list