[PATCH RFC] ARM: at91: removal of CAP9 SoC family
nicolas.ferre at atmel.com
Fri Jan 13 14:12:53 EST 2012
On 01/13/2012 07:16 PM, Greg KH :
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> On 01/06/2012 04:33 PM, Nicolas Ferre :
>>> Atmel CAP9 family is not maintained well and products may be
>>> difficult to find now. It will allow to save workforce and
>>> remove LOC during current cleanup process.
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
>>> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> Hi Andrew, Greg,
>> Can you please take this patch or is somebody else in charge of this file?
> Why wouldn't the maintainers of the feature you are saying is going away
> be the ones responsible for submitting this?
Actually, I am the guy ;-)
>> It it is going to mainline through you, can you add also:
>> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
>> Or tell me to resend a complete patch.
>> Thanks for your help, best regards,
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
>>> index 3d84912..23dfea5 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
>>> @@ -551,3 +551,17 @@ When: 3.5
>>> Why: The iwlagn module has been renamed iwlwifi. The alias will be around
>>> for backward compatibility for several cycles and then dropped.
>>> Who: Don Fry <donald.h.fry at intel.com>
>>> +What: The CAP9 SoC family will be removed
>>> +When: 3.4
>>> +Files: arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c
>>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c
>>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9.h
>>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_matrix.h
>>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_ddrsdr.h
>>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c
>>> +Why: The code is not actively maintained and platforms are now hard to find.
>>> +Who: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
>>> + Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> Ok, why not send this through the ARM tree? Why need me and Andrew?
Ok, I though there was a special procedure for this file. I will queue
this one in arm-soc tree.
Thanks, best regards,
More information about the linux-arm-kernel