[PATCH] versatile: don't generate a duplicate IRQ domain

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:26:11PM +0000, Jamie Iles wrote:
> No, because:
> 
> 	vic_init()
> 	  __vic_init() -> with NULL np pointer
> 	    vic_register()
> 	
> So we won't have the device_node for the VIC.  I think I really need to 
> convert the versatile stuff over to the full of_irq_init() method of 
> probing, which isn't as bad as I thought as everything is populated from 
> the DT there but it looked like it could be registered statically too 
> from versatile_init().  I'll try and get everything going from the DT 
> now.

Won't this make Versatile a DT-only platform?