linux-next: please update the i.MX tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Sascha,

On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:34:29 +0100 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:34:57AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Should I, instead, just remove that tree from linux-next and let you send
> > stuff just via the arm-soc (or arm)tree?
> 
> Yes, that's probably best. That's what I do anyway.

OK, done.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120111/c7944f39/attachment.sig>