linux-next: please update the i.MX tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Sascha,

On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:30:20 +0100 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:52:18AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > It looks like most (if not all) of the i.MX tree has been merged into the
> > arm-soc (and Linus') tree, so could you please update the i.MX tree to
> > eliminate the conflicts I am getting.
> 
> Did this. Sorry, I was not aware that there is something in this branch.

Did you push it out? I just checked and it hasn't changed. Just to be
clear, I am fetching git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git
branch for-next and it hasn't changed since last September.

Should I, instead, just remove that tree from linux-next and let you send
stuff just via the arm-soc (or arm)tree?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120111/1ecdc34a/attachment.sig>