[PATCH 10/14] mmc: mmci: Cache MMCICLOCK and MMCIPOWER register
Ulf Hansson
ulf.hansson at stericsson.com
Mon Jan 9 10:12:51 EST 2012
Hi again,
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:35:56PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> Instead of reading a register value everytime we need to
>> apply a new value for it, maintain a cached copy for it.
>> This also means we are able to skip writes that are not
>> needed.
>
> I'm not sure this is a good idea. The ARM Primecells require a certain
> number of bus clocks and MCLK periods between writes to both these
> registers, and reading them back helps to ensure that we conform to
> that requirement. Maintaining a cached copy of them allows faster
> writes to these registers which could cause that requirement to be
> violated.
I were just about to update my patch according to your proposal, when I
realized the only place were the registers were previously "read before
write", were at an SDIO corner case in pio_write.
Earlier the register values were always written, without considering the
old value. Thus the impact with this patch is kind of only decreasing
the number of writes and affects a corner case for SDIO.
Do you anyway prefer to add a register "read before write" even if it
never has been needed before?
>
> What you could do is read the register, modify, and check whether the
> modification has had any effect before writing it back. That will
> allow unnecessary writes to still be skipped.
>
Sorry for spamming you.
BR
Ulf Hansson
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list