[PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: intc: Add irqdomain support
Cousson, Benoit
b-cousson at ti.com
Mon Jan 9 04:56:24 EST 2012
Hi Grant,
On 1/6/2012 10:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:39:55PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
[...]
>> + /*
>> + * XXX: Use a 0 irq_base for the moment since the legacy devices
>> + * created statically are expected a hwirq = irq mapping.
>> + * A proper offset will be added later, when IRQ resource creation
>> + * will be handled by DT.
>> + */
>> + domain.irq_base = 0;
>> + domain.nr_irq = nr_irqs;
>> + domain.ops =&irq_domain_simple_ops;
>> + irq_domain_add(&domain);
>
> The omap doesn't need anything special from irq_domain. You can use
> irq_domain_add_simple(). A recent patch was posted that makes
> irq_domain_add_simple() accepts a nr_irqs parameter and returns the
> allocated irq domain.
Yes, I saw that, but in fact as discussed previously with Rob, even the
irq_domain_add_simple should become useless when Rob's series to convert
generic-chip to use irq_domain will be merged.
I have a patch ready for that, but like Nico for AT91, I decided to
avoid that dependency for 3.3, since that series was not yet stable.
> However, that isn't enough reason for me to reject this patch if there
> is any opportunity to get it into v3.3 provided you promise to fix it
> up later.
Yes, I do :-)
> Acked-by: Grant Likely<grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
Thanks,
Benoit
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list