[RFC PATCH v3 2/5] pinctrl: add dt binding support for pinmux mappings
shawn.guo at linaro.org
Fri Jan 6 00:27:51 EST 2012
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 05:05:46PM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
> I'm confused because the node has properties for function name and
> group name which make sense to define the mux setting for that group.
> However, I'm not sure what the grp-pins/num-pins/grp-mux/num-mux
> properties are for; if those properties define the available mux options
> and for the group and set of pins included in the group, I think the node
> is representing too many things in one place. I'd expect to see:
> a) Either data in the pinctrl driver
For imx, I'm against this.
> or separate DT nodes to define each
> available pin group, mux function, etc.; the definition of what the SoC
> itself can do.
This works for me. But we do not necessarily need to enumerate all
the possible groups from the beginning. Instead, we can add the groups
> b) The configuration of each pin group that's used by the particular board.
> All that's relevant here is the mux selection for each pin groups; things
> like which pins are included in each group are defined by the SoC not the
> board and hence wouldn't be included in a per-board node.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel