[PATCH v2 00/15] Make SMP timers standalone

[Marc Zyngier]

On 05/01/12 00:00, Linus Walleij wrote:
> However IIRC this situation does not occur in the ARM reference
> designs, notably Versatile Express since it simply isn't designed to
> be power-agressive in this way and does not gate the clock or
> power down the CPU power domain, it's always on, always
> clocked (albeit with shifting frequency).
> 
> The Vexpress seem to register a clockevent for its SP804
> timer, and even though I've never used this machine I guess
> it would tick a few ticks during boot and then as TWD is
> registered it switches to that (due to higher .rate) and
> no IRQ is ever fired on the SP804 again.
> 
> Does this correspond to what is seen in /proc/interrupts
> on the Vexpress?

Yes. You get about 8 ticks worth of SP804, and then switch to TWD for good.

> And does the system really work if you simply delete the
> code registering the SP804 clockevent from
> mach-vexpress/ct-ca9x4.c?

No, because you need the global timer to calibrate the TWD on this
platform. But on the VE with a Cortex-A15 tile, the system works
perfectly with the architected timers being the only one in the system
(the SP804 is left unconfigured).

But now that your cpufreq-aware patches are in -next, I can boot a Panda
without a single tick of the global timer (OMAP4 provides the "smp-twd"
clock).

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...