snowball does not compile on linux-next

[Linus Walleij]

On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano at linaro.org> wrote:

> the kernel does not compile when
> CONFIG_CLKSRC_DBX500_PRCMU_SCHED_CLOCK is set.
>
> it fails with :
>
>  CHK     include/linux/version.h
>  CHK     include/generated/utsrelease.h
> make[1]: `include/generated/mach-types.h' is up to date.
>  CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
>  CHK     include/generated/compile.h
>  CC      drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.o
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c:61: warning: type defaults
> to ?int? in declaration of ?DEFINE_CLOCK_DATA?
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c:61: warning: parameter names
> (without types) in function declaration
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c: In function ?sched_clock?:
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c:72: error: implicit
> declaration of function ?cyc_to_sched_clock?
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c:72: error: ?cd? undeclared
> (first use in this function)
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c:72: error: (Each undeclared
> identifier is reported only once
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c:72: error: for each function
> it appears in.)
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c: In function
> ?clksrc_dbx500_prcmu_update_sched_clock?:
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c:78: error: implicit
> declaration of function ?update_sched_clock?
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c:78: error: ?cd? undeclared
> (first use in this function)
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c: In function
> ?clksrc_dbx500_prcmu_init?:
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c:100: error: implicit
> declaration of function ?init_sched_clock?
> drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c:100: error: ?cd? undeclared
> (first use in this function)
> make[2]: *** [drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [drivers/clocksource] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> Is it dead code ?

No if it was dead it shouldn't get compiled.

It' probably just some fallout from Marc's rewrite of the
sched_clock() stuff, I'll see if I can cook a patch and
send off to Marc.

Yours,
Linus Walleij