[PATCH] dmaengine: Add support for MEMCPY for imx-dma.

[javier Martin]

Hi Vinod,
thank you for your review.

On 23 December 2011 18:38, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com> wrote:
>> @@ -328,6 +329,37 @@ static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *imxdma_prep_dma_cyclic(
>>       return &imxdmac->desc;
>>  }
>>
>> +static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *imxdma_prep_dma_memcpy(
>> +     struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dest,
>> +     dma_addr_t src, size_t len, unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> +     struct imxdma_channel *imxdmac = to_imxdma_chan(chan);
>> +     struct imxdma_engine *imxdma = imxdmac->imxdma;
>> +     int ret;
>> +
>> +     dev_dbg(imxdma->dev, "%s channel: %d src=0x%x dst=0x%x len=%d\n",
>> +                     __func__, imxdmac->channel, src, dest, len);
>> +
>> +     if (imxdmac->status == DMA_IN_PROGRESS)
>> +             return NULL;
>> +
>> +     imxdmac->status = DMA_IN_PROGRESS;
> why? prepare doesn't mean DMA is in progress. You can get multiple
> descriptors for same channel by calling prepare multiple times.
> Even one descriptor can be memcpy whereas other is slave...
> In issue_pending this should be moved to DMA_IN_PROGRESS

According to the original developer of this file it only supports a
single descriptor. Please, take a look at the following function:

static void imxdma_issue_pending(struct dma_chan *chan)
{
	/*
	 * Nothing to do. We only have a single descriptor
	 */
}


Also, the same behavior is present in the other prepare functions:
"imxdma_prep_slave_sg" and "imxdma_prep_dma_cyclic".

I think the less painful approach here is merging my patch so that
multiple descriptors support can be added later.

--
Javier Martin
Vista Silicon S.L.
CDTUC - FASE C - Oficina S-345
Avda de los Castros s/n
39005- Santander. Cantabria. Spain
+34 942 25 32 60
www.vista-silicon.com