[PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: add low and high res support for adc
Maxime Ripard
maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com
Fri Dec 21 04:07:13 EST 2012
Le 20/12/2012 17:13, ludovic.desroches a écrit :
> On 12/20/2012 04:51 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi Ludovic,
>>
>> Le 20/12/2012 11:52, ludovic.desroches a écrit :
>>>> I'm wondering, why are you using such a complex dt parsing code, and
>>>> bindings, when you only requires a boolean to switch between 8 and 10
>>>> bits mode (which seem to be the only thing you support)?
>>>
>>> We will have a 10 and 12 bits mode on future ADCs and I would like to
>>> have something which could manage more than two resolutions if it
>>> happens one day.
>>
>> I see your point. I'm not fond at all of the existing bindings for the
>> driver (putting things like registers offset in the dt is a non-sense to
>> me, but hey...), so I'd like to still keep it as simple and non-bloated
>> as possible, but it's true that in the current situation, we probably
>> have no other choice.
>>
>
> I have the same feeling than you about ADC bindings, I think that there
> are too many parameters exhibited. Moreover, most of them are chip
> relative.
>
> I have not found other ways to deal with it properly. I would like to
> have them hidden into the driver (depending on the compatible string)
> but it will be a mess if we split parameters into dt and driver.
I'm glad we feel the same way :)
> So the idea was to have a binding which could allow us to manage several
> cases about resolution modes in the future.
Yes, I got the idea. Like I said, if we don't want to touch at the
bindings and do want you suggested, then your patch is the best solution
we have.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list