[PATCH 1/2] clk: introduce optional disable_unused callback

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org> wrote:

>> According to commit msg, it seems like the .disable_unused function
>> will be optional and must only be implemented for those clks that has
>> has special issues to consider.
>>
>
> That is correct.  I don't want people to read the above code while
> porting their platform and perceive that .disable_unused is mandatory
> in any way.  Using the same function in both pointers defeats the
> purpose of the new optional callback.

Aha I get it...
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij