[PATCH/RFT 6/8] ARM: OMAP: remove unused cpu_is_omap3505()
Koen Kooi
koen at dominion.thruhere.net
Mon Apr 30 05:35:43 EDT 2012
Op 30 apr. 2012, om 11:07 heeft Jean Pihet het volgende geschreven:
> Kevin,
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman at ti.com> wrote:
>> The 3505 check is now unused and can be removed.
>>
>> There are no longer any cpu_is_* checks that depend on specific IP
>> detection.
>>
>> Acked-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav at ti.com>
>> Tested-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav at ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman at ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h | 8 +-------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h
>> index 41f3e5a..b34bf6c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h
>> @@ -250,8 +250,7 @@ IS_AM_SUBCLASS(335x, 0x335)
>> * cpu_is_omap2423(): True for OMAP2423
>> * cpu_is_omap2430(): True for OMAP2430
>> * cpu_is_omap3430(): True for OMAP3430
>> - * cpu_is_omap3505(): True for OMAP3505
>> - * cpu_is_omap3517(): True for OMAP3517
>> + * cpu_is_omap3517(): True for AM35x: OMAP3517, OMAP3505
> Is cpu_is_omap35xx() a better name for it?
No, since 3530 is the same as 3430 :(
regards,
Koen
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list