[PATCH 0/8] gpio/omap: remaining cleanups and fix

[Grant Likely]

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman at ti.com> wrote:
> Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:43:30 +0530, Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti at ti.com> wrote:
>>> Here are the remaining cleanup patches. There are broadly
>>> two categories of cleanups.
>>>
>>> Cat-1: Those missed while introducing new feature like SPARSE_IRQ
>>>        handling and DT support; use edge/level handlers from
>>>        generic IRQ framework.
>>>
>>> Cat-2: Removal of redundant fields from struct gpio_bank{} as a
>>>        result of they being already covered by members within
>>>        context field of struct gpio_bank{}.
>>>
>>> Reference: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
>>> Commit: 66f75a5d028beaf67c931435fdc3e7823125730c (Linux 3.4-rc4)
>>>
>>> Series is available for reference here:
>>> git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-dev.git for_3.5/gpio_more_cleanup_fixes
>>>
>>> Test info:
>>> OMAP2+ platforms: OMAP2430SDP, OMAP3430SDP, OMAP4430SDP
>>> OMAP1: Bootup test on OMAP1710SDP.
>>>
>>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman at ti.com>
>>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
>>> Cc: Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson at ti.com>
>>> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
>>> Tarun Kanti DebBarma (8):
>>>   gpio/omap: remove virtual_irq_start variable
>>>   gpio/omap: remove saved_fallingdetect, saved_risingdetect
>>>   gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank
>>>   gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank
>>>   gpio/omap: remove retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler
>>>   gpio/omap: remove suspend/resume callbacks
>>>   gpio/omap: remove cpu_is_omapxxxx() checks from *_runtime_resume()
>>>   gpio/omap: fix missing check in *_runtime_suspend()
>>
>> The changes look fine to me.  Which branch should this series be
>> merged through?  It can either go via arm-soc or my gpio/next branch.
>
> This needs a little more review/testing on OMAP.
>
> Expect a pull request from me when it's ready and you can take it
> through gpio/nex.

Okay.

g.