[PATCH V3 0/8] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework

Turquette, Mike mturquette at ti.com
Fri Apr 27 13:50:49 EDT 2012


On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at st.com> wrote:
> On 4/24/2012 12:20 PM, Viresh KUMAR wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> You can apply all these patches as they don't have any dependency left (leaving
>> the ones included here) and will now apply cleanly over linux-next.
>
> Mike,
>
> These patches give compilation errors over your clk-next branch.
> This happened due to following patch.
>
> commit 1c0035d710dd3bfa86d58f851b8737c7f11a9bbc
> Author: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org>
> Date:   Thu Apr 12 20:50:18 2012 +0800
>
>    clk: pass parent_rate into .set_rate
>
>    For most of .set_rate implementation, parent_rate will be used, so just
>    like passing parent_rate into .recalc_rate, let's pass parent_rate into
>    .set_rate too.
>
>    It also updates the kernel doc for .set_rate ops.
>
>    Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org>
>    Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org>
>
> I will send fixups as reply on individual patches, and then send you pull request
> with these changes squashed to parent commits.

Ok great.  A public branch for me to pull from would be great.

Thanks,
Mike

> --
> viresh



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list