[PATCH] arm: davinci: pdctl next bit position incorrect

Sekhar Nori nsekhar at ti.com
Thu Apr 26 13:34:02 EDT 2012


Hi Sergei,

On 4/20/2012 8:39 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 04/19/2012 08:52 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> 
>>>>> The PDCTL NEXT bit is incorrectly set to bit 1 instead of bit 0. This
>>>>> patch fixes this issue
> 
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri<m-karicheri2 at ti.com>
> 
>>>> Applying this for v3.5.
> 
>>>     But why not to 3.4? It concerns turning on DSP domain on DM644x.
> 
>> Yes, but I think as you noted sometime before, no one is really
>> depending on kernel to turn on DSP domain on DM644x.
> 
>    Looks like you're right (though I don't remember noting it :-).
> 
>> Its probably being
>> done from U-Boot or ROM code. This is not a v3.4 regression either.
> 
>    U-Boot does it only when DSPLINK support is not desired.

Okay. Since DSPLink existed long before this code to turn on domain was
introduced by Murali, it must be having its own private code to do this.
So, looks like this should not really be a regression for anyone.

Thanks,
Sekhar



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list