[PATCH 31/33] ARM i.MX5: implement clocks using common clock framework
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Thu Apr 26 09:02:22 EDT 2012
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:48:00PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> more out of curiosity, why is the i.MX50 always excluded. Is it so vastly
> different to the MX51 and MX53?
I don't think that it's so different. I think the reason is that the
i.MX50 is not widely used outside of some special applications. At least
we have no customers using it.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list