[PATCHv8 07/10] I2C: OMAP: Handle error check for pm runtime

[Wolfram Sang]

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 06:58:18PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> If PM runtime get_sync fails return with the error
> so that no further reads/writes goes through the interface.
> This will avoid possible abort. Add a error message in case
> of failure with the cause of the failure.

I don't think the error message is especially helpful. You also use different
string (probably typo).

> 
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti at ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c |   19 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> index 44e8cfa..d555dcd 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> @@ -585,7 +585,11 @@ omap_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
>  	int i;
>  	int r;
>  
> -	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->dev);
> +	r = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->dev);
> +	if (r < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync failed %d\n", r);
> +		return r;
> +	}
>  
>  	r = omap_i2c_wait_for_bb(dev);
>  	if (r < 0)
> @@ -1011,7 +1015,11 @@ omap_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		dev->regs = (u8 *)reg_map_ip_v1;
>  
>  	pm_runtime_enable(dev->dev);
> -	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->dev);
> +	r = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->dev);
> +	if (r < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync failed:%d\n", r);
> +		return r;
> +	}

Smatch says:

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c:1021 omap_i2c_probe() warn: 'mem->start' was not released on error

In fact, you are leaking quite more.

> @@ -1103,12 +1111,17 @@ omap_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct omap_i2c_dev	*dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	struct resource		*mem;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>  
>  	free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
>  	i2c_del_adapter(&dev->adapter);
> -	pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync failed %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}

I am no too familiar with runtime_pm. Is it really so bad to fail remove, when
get_sync has an error? Why is it checked and e.g. pm_runtime_put later is not?
Any pointers?

>  	omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, 0);
>  	pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
>  	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> -- 
> 1.7.5.4
> 

Thanks,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120423/e62475bd/attachment.sig>