[PATCH 01/18] led-triggers: create a trigger for CPU activity
Bryan Wu
bryan.wu at canonical.com
Fri Apr 20 03:26:13 EDT 2012
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 4/17/2012 3:53 AM, Bryan Wu wrote:
>> +static int __init ledtrig_cpu_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int cpu;
>> +
>> + /* Supports up to 9999 cpu cores */
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS > 9999);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Registering CPU led trigger for each CPU cores here
>> + * ignores CPU hotplug, but after this CPU hotplug works
>> + * fine with this trigger.
>> + */
>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + struct led_trigger *trig;
>> + char *name = per_cpu(trig_name, cpu);
>> + struct rw_semaphore *lock = &per_cpu(trig_lock, cpu);
>> +
>> + init_rwsem(lock);
>
> What is this lock protecting?
>
>> +
>> + snprintf(name, MAX_NAME_LEN, "cpu%d", cpu);
>> +
>> + down_write(lock);
>> + led_trigger_register_simple(name, &trig);
>> + per_cpu(cpu_trig, cpu) = trig;
>> + up_write(lock);
>
> This is the only place it is locked and unlocked.
>
> I think the previous comment was about how led_trigger_register_simple()
> exposed a live trigger but it wasn't assigned to the per_cpu variable
> yet. Can we not just reorder the assignment so we have
>
> struct led_trigger *trig = NULL;
> ...
> per_cpu(cpu_trig, cpu) = trig;
> led_trigger_register_simple();
>
I thinked about reordering like you posted here before, but
led_trigger_register_simple(const char *name, struct led_trigger **tp)
will modify the value of pointer trig here, because it use **tp to do
that.
So a lock here just protects the critical region, looks like safer to
kill race condition pointed out by Tim.
Thanks,
--
Bryan Wu <bryan.wu at canonical.com>
Kernel Developer +86.186-168-78255 Mobile
Canonical Ltd. www.canonical.com
Ubuntu - Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list