[PATCH 00/13] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Wed Apr 18 17:13:03 EDT 2012
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 01:45:42PM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 April 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> SPEAr now supports common clock framework. This patchset contains changes
> >> related to this. It also contain few dependency commits for clock framework that
> >> are earlier sent separately.
> >> @Mike: It would be easiest to get these through ARM-SoC tree. So, would need
> >> your Acked-by on these patches. But firstly they must get reivewed :)
> > We should agree on how we want to do the common clk patches for v3.5.
> > The two options I see are either we take all the patches that Mike
> > Acks into arm-soc, or Mike applies the patches in his own tree and
> > submits them to arm-soc. I think either way is fine for me, but
> > some people might feel strongly one way or another.
> I would prefer the latter (I maintain a branch and submit it). Is
> arm-soc still the right place for common clk patches in 3.5 and
> beyond? I don't mind hosting a branch for inclusion into linux-next
> and sending a pull request to Linus. There is nothing ARM-specific
> about the common framework.
Either way is fine with me, but it's really important that all the
floating clock framework patches begin to materialize in a visible
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel